You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 27, 2011

Draft Surrogacy Act Under Consideration

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Recent headlines of a company offering surrogacy services in exchange for money have brought the issue of assisted reproductive technologies back into the public eye, shedding light on the fact that Thai law has not kept up with advancements in infertility treatment. Currently, couples in Thailand who wish to have a child, yet for whatever reason are unable to do so via natural methods, have limited options, adoption being the most common. But what about those couples who wish to have a child that is genetically theirs?

Assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization and surrogacy are also options.  Parental legal rights and duties are set out in the Civil and Commercial Code of Thailand, and adoption is outlined under the Child Adoption Act.  But while assisted reproductive technologies exist and are utilized in Thailand, the matter falls into a legal “grey area.”  Now a draft piece of legislation, the Surrogacy Act, seeks to specify the legal bases and add some much-needed clarity to the issue.

The Surrogacy Act has, in fact, been in the drafting process for several years; having already been passed by the Cabinet, it is still under review and awaiting approval of the Parliament.  Under the proposed legislation, legally married couples would be allowed to engage a surrogate mother to carry out pregnancy on their behalf.  These are some of the conditions that must be met:

  • The couple must be both mentally and physically prepared to become parents.
  • The surrogate mother must not be an ancestor or descendant of the social parents.
  • The surrogate mother must have previously delivered a child, and in the case she is married, the husband’s consent must also be granted.
  • An appraisal must be carried out according to the rules, procedures, and conditions as prescribed under the Surrogacy Act, which must cover environmental factors as well as potential diseases which could impact the newborn.

Most importantly, the Surrogacy Act sets out the rights of the social parents, the surrogate mother, and the newborn child.  Under present law, a child born through surrogacy is considered the legitimate child of the birth mother (and her husband, if legally married), meaning the social parents do not have any legal parental rights to the child.  The general method of dealing with this situation is, subsequent to delivery, for the prospective parents to go through the process of adoption.  But this of course entails a lengthy process in dealing with the related governmental authorities; and particularly for foreign couples engaging a Thai surrogate mother, burdensome time and expense.

Surrogacy arrangements have yet to be tested in the Thai courts, and an agreement or contract entering into a surrogacy arrangement before the Surrogacy Act becomes effective could be deemed to violate provisions of public order and/or good morals.

Based on the current draft wording of the bill, all the legal parental rights and duties will be conferred to the social parents without the need to go through the adoption process or proceed with other legally more dubious methods.  In addition, the Juvenile and Family Court is granted jurisdiction to hear cases involving any disputes related to parenthood as a result of surrogacy, which is a much-needed step in the direction of protecting the rights of prospective parents—for example, in case the birth mother reneges on a surrogacy arrangement and decides to keep the child for herself.

It should be noted that as it stands, commercial surrogacy is not explicitly illegal under Thai law.  However, the practice would be strictly prohibited if the Surrogacy Act passes.  No payments or compensation of any kind would be allowed to be made to the surrogate mother, the exception being those related to health maintenance costs at the time of pregnancy, delivery, and post-delivery although the criteria for such have yet to be established.

Under the new law, engaging in commercial surrogacy would entail heavy penalties—a maximum of ten years’ imprisonment and fine of up to 200,000 baht.  And both brokerage and advertising, whether for commercial benefit or not, would also be strictly prohibited, with violation resulting in a maximum of five years’ imprisonment and/or a fine of up to 100,000 baht.

Related Professionals
Michael C. Yukubousky
Email

RELATED INSIGHTS​

July 24, 2024
Experts from Tilleke & Gibbins’ intellectual property team have contributed an updated Intellectual Property Transactions in Vietnam to Thomson Reuters Practical Law, a high-level comparative overview of  laws and regulations across multiple jurisdictions. Intellectual Property Transactions focuses on business-related aspects of intellectual property, such as the value of intellectual assets in M&A transactions, and the licensing of IP portfolios. Key topics covered in the chapter include: IP assignment: Basis and formalities for assignments of patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, trade secrets, confidential information, and domain names. IP licensing: Scope and formalities for licensing patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, and trade secrets. Research and development collaborations. IP audits. IP aspects of M&A: Due diligence, warranties/indemnities, and transfer of IPRs. Employee and consultant agreements. Practical Law, a legal reference resource from Thomson Reuters, publishes a range of guides for hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The Intellectual Property Transactions Global Guide is a valuable resource for legal practitioners, covering numerous jurisdictions worldwide. To view the latest version of the Intellectual Property Transactions in Vietnam overview, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
July 24, 2024
Intellectual property specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins in Thailand have contributed an updated Intellectual Property Transactions in Thailand overview for Thomson Reuters Practical Law, an online publication that provides comprehensive legal guides for jurisdictions worldwide. The Thailand overview was authored by Darani Vachanavuttivong, managing partner of Tilleke & Gibbins and managing director of the firm’s regional IP practice; Titikaan Ungbhakorn, senior associate and patent agent; and San Chaithiraphant, senior associate. The chapter delivers a high-level examination of critical aspects of IP law, including IP assignment and licensing, research and development collaborations, IP in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), securing loans with intellectual property rights, settlement agreements, employee-related IP issues, competition law, taxation, and non-tariff trade barriers. Key topics covered in the chapter include: IP assignment: Basis and formalities for assignments of patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, trade secrets, confidential information, and domain names. IP licensing: Scope and formalities for licensing patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, and trade secrets. Research and development collaborations: Management of improvements, derivatives, and joint ownership of IP. IP aspects of M&A: Due diligence and critical considerations during mergers and acquisitions. Practical Law, a legal reference resource from Thomson Reuters, publishes a range of guides for hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The Intellectual Property Transactions Global Guide is a valuable resource for legal practitioners, covering numerous jurisdictions worldwide. To view the latest version of the Intellectual Property Transactions in Thailand overview, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
July 24, 2024
Acted as lead counsel for Nordic Transport Group A/S (NTG), an international freight forwarding company based in Denmark, in its acquisition of a stake in Asia-based Freightzen Logistics Ltd., Inc. through a newly established subsidiary, NTG APAC Holding Pte. Ltd.
July 23, 2024
In the Who’s Who Legal (WWL) Southeast Asia guide for 2024, a total of 12 Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers have been distinguished as market leaders in various legal practice areas. The firm’s 12 recognized lawyers, singled out for their commitment to delivering exceptional legal services to Tilleke & Gibbins’ clients, are grouped into seven practice areas: Asset Recovery: Thawat Damsa-ard Data: Alan Adcock, Athistha (Nop) Chitranukroh Franchise: Alan Adcock, Jay Cohen Intellectual Property: Alan Adcock (Patents, Trademarks), Darani Vachanavuttivong (Patents, Trademarks), Kasama Sriwatanakul (Trademarks), Linh Thi Mai Nguyen (Trademarks), Somboon Earterasarun (Trademarks), Wongrat Ratanaprayul (Patents) Investigations: John Frangos and Thawat Damsa-ard Labor, Employment, and Benefits: Pimvimol (June) Vipamaneerut Life Sciences: Alan Adcock, Loc Xuan Le The annual WWL Southeast Asia rankings guide, published by the London-based group Law Business Research, aims to identify the foremost legal practitioners across a range of business law practice areas. The rankings are largely based on feedback and nominations received from other WWL-ranked and nominated attorneys around the world. These peer-driven recognitions highlight Tilleke & Gibbins’ dedication to maintaining the highest standards of legal service and helping clients achieve success. To read more about the WWL Southeast Asia guide, or to browse the full results, please visit the WWL website.