Decree 05 Updates Extended Producer Responsibility Regulations in Vietnam

February 23, 2025

Decree 05 Updates Extended Producer Responsibility Regulations in Vietnam

On January 6, 2025, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 05/2025/ND-CP amending and supplementing Decree No. 08/2022/ND-CP detailing the Law on Environmental Protection (“Decree 05”). Decree 05 came into effect immediately upon issuance and provides several changes to the regulations governing extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) for applicable manufacturers and importers, outlining their obligations concerning the recycling and treatment of discarded products and packages. (See our previous article on Vietnam’s EPR regulations here.)

Outlined below are some critical amendments in Decree 05.

Entities Subject to EPR Regulations

Previously, Decree 08 limited the responsibility for recycling to manufacturers and importers of products and packaging specified in statutory lists. Decree 05 expands this scope by also including entities responsible for the quality and labeling of the regulated products and goods in Vietnam.

Decree 05 inherits the regulations from Decree 08 that manufacturers and importers, if they produce and import products and packaging as stipulated by law, must fulfill their responsibility to recycle or support waste treatment activities. However, Decree 05 amends the lists of products/packaging that must be recycled or undergo waste treatment, and new products/packaging and recycling methods.

Notably, rechargeable batteries (including those used in vehicles or for electrical and electronic devices) have been added to the list of regulated products and self-propelled vehicles and construction machinery have been removed from the list.

Decree 05 also not only streamlines the recycling methods required for each type of product/packaging, but also removes the minimum requirement on the mass of products/packaging that must be recovered when recycling. Manufacturers and importers now have more flexibility in selecting recycling methods that are more suitable for actual recycling conditions in Vietnam.

Decree 05 has revised the cases of exemption from recycling and waste treatment obligations, clarifying that both packaging manufacturers and importers with annual product sales revenue below VND 30 billion are exempt from recycling responsibilities. The threshold for importers has increased compared to the previous provision. Further, Decree 05 introduces an additional exemption for manufacturers who collect and reuse their own packaging. Specifically, manufacturers who self-collect and reuse packaging to put it back on the market are exempted from recycling and waste treatment obligations if the rate of collection and repackaging meets or exceeds the mandatory recycling rate as stipulated by law.

Competent Authorities

Previously, the prime minister was responsible for adjusting and issuing mandatory recycling rates for each type of product and packaging, and issuing the recycling cost standard for a unit of product and packaging volume (referred to as “Fs” – see below) and the required financial contribution for waste treatment. Under the new decree, these responsibilities have been transferred to the Minister of Natural Resources and Environment.

Definition of Fs

Decree 05 specifies two components for the calculation of the recycling cost standard, “Fs”:

Recycling cost associated with the sorting, collecting, transporting, and recycling of products and packaging; and
Management cost associated with the supervision and support of the implementation of product and packaging recycling responsibilities. Management cost is specified as 2% of the recycling cost.

In particular, the recycling cost is estimated based on an adjustment coefficient reflecting the level of collection and recycling value of products and packaging: Products and packaging with a high collection rate and high recycling value have a low adjustment coefficient, while products and packaging with a low collection rate and low recycling value have a high adjustment coefficient.

Deadline for Financial Contribution

Decree 08 allowed manufacturers and importers to either pay the full financial contribution for waste treatment to the Vietnam Environmental Protection Fund by April 20 of each year or split the payment into two installments. However, Decree 05 mandates a full financial contribution in a single installment by April 20 each year. This is a significant change that manufacturers and importers should take note of, especially once the Fs is officially issued.

Tax Incentives

Decree 05 expands upon Decree 08 by providing specific criteria for eligibility for tax incentives beyond corporate income tax. These incentives now include exemptions from export and import taxes for eligible activities.

Specifically, products made from recycling and waste treatment activities in the list of environmental protection activities eligible for incentives and support will be exempted from export tax if they meet certain legal criteria, such as having production activities consistent with the project’s operational objectives, or using waste as production materials.

Similarly, projects importing machinery and equipment for use in waste treatment and environmental protection activities will be exempted from import tax if they meet certain criteria such as having the results of an environmental impact assessment report appraisal approved, or being granted an environmental license.

Related Professionals

Tu Ngoc Trinh

Vietnam

+84 24 3772 5556

Email

Cam Ha Trinh

Paralegal

Vietnam

+84 28 628 45678

Email

RELATED INSIGHTS

February 13, 2025

Thailand Updates Contract Controls on Vehicle Purchase Reservations

The Contract Committee of Thailand’s Office of the Consumer Protection Board has issued a notification updating the stipulation that any sale of a new vehicle or motorcycle requiring an upfront deposit from the consumer for reservation purposes is now classified as a contract-controlled business. Titled “Requiring Reservation Agreements for New Vehicles and Motorcycles to be Contract-Controlled Businesses B.E. 2567,” the notification takes effect on February 19, 2025, and supersedes the previous notification from 2008, which applied only to “vehicles” (excluding motorcycles). Key changes and requirements introduced by the new notification include: Inclusion of electric vehicles and motorcycles. The notification now extends beyond traditional vehicles powered by combustion engines to include those powered by electricity. It also covers motorcycles powered by both combustion engines and electricity. Definition of order deposit. An order deposit is defined as any money or benefit provided by the consumer to reserve a vehicle or motorcycle. It is distinct from a security deposit and is solely for reservation purposes. Standardized order deposit agreement. Order deposit agreements must be in Thai and clearly visible and readable. Business operators must use the template prescribed by the notification to ensure compliance with the standardized terms and conditions. This extends to both physical and electronic agreements and includes transactions facilitated by digital platform providers. Specification of delivery date. Agreements must specify the exact date, month, and year for delivery, unlike the previous requirement for only an estimated delivery date. Detailed deposit collection description. Agreements must outline the method of deposit collection, providing more specificity than the general description required previously. Prohibited terms. Agreements must not include: Limitation or exclusion of liability for the business operator’s faults. Provisions allowing the business operator to change the delivery date or conditions to the consumer’s detriment. Provisions allowing the business operator to terminate the

November 18, 2024

Thailand Reaffirms Alcoholic Beverage Packaging and Labeling Requirements

A new notification on required labeling and packaging for alcoholic beverages was published in Thailand’s Government Gazette on November 8, 2024, taking full effect the following day. The notification (Notification of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Committee Re: Criteria, Methods, and Conditions for Packaging of Alcoholic Beverages and Warning Statements of Alcoholic Beverages Both Produced Domestically and Imported into Thailand 2024) essentially reaffirms a mandatory requirement for packaging and warning statements for alcoholic beverages, which echoes existing regulations from 2009 and 2017. Under the authority of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act B.E. 2551 (2008) (ABCA), the notification reinforces the Alcoholic Beverage Control Committee’s objective of promoting consumer awareness through standardized warning labels. The notification addresses the following key aspects: Packaging definitions. The notification defines packing-related terms for the first time under the ABCA. These terms include (1) packaging, (2) containers (also known as primary packaging), and (3) outer packaging (secondary packaging). Packaging requirements. Containers for alcoholic beverages produced or imported for sale in Thailand must be at least 0.175 liters each. Warning statements. Although alcoholic beverages are classified as food under the Food Act B.E. 2522 (1979), the notification exempts alcoholic beverages from general food labeling requirements prescribed in the Food Act. Instead, it mandates that the following warning statements be prominently displayed: Sale of liquor to persons under 20 years old is prohibited; Drinking reduces driving ability; and Not suitable for persons under 20 years old. Format. The notification specifies that these warning statements must be written in Thai, in bold characters, with a minimum type size of five millimeters. The warning must be enclosed in a box that contrasts with the label background and surrounding content. Exemptions. Certain products, such as alcoholic beverages imported as samples or otherwise not intended for commercial sale, are exempt from the warning

November 1, 2024

ICLG: Franchise 2025—Thailand Chapter

Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Thailand chapter to Franchise 2025 from the International Comparative Legal Guides (ICLG) series published by Global Legal Group. This comprehensive guide provides detailed analysis of franchise laws and regulations across multiple jurisdictions worldwide. Each chapter of the guide follows a Q&A format, organized into key sections covering critical aspects of franchise law and operations, including: Relevant legislation and rules governing franchise transactions Business organization options for franchised operations Competition law considerations Protection of intellectual property and brands Liability issues and risk mitigation Governing law and dispute resolution Real estate matters Online trading regulations Termination requirements Joint employer risks and vicarious liability Currency controls and taxation Commercial agency considerations Good faith obligations and fair dealing requirements Ongoing relationship management Franchise renewal processes Franchise migration procedures Electronic signatures and document retention The Thailand chapter, authored by Alan Adcock and Kasama Sriwatanakul, examines these topics in detail, with particular attention to recent developments like the Trade Competition Commission’s Franchising Guidelines which introduced new disclosure requirements and protections for franchisees. The complete Thailand chapter is available as a PDF below. The Thailand chapter—and the full Franchise 2025 guide—are also freely available on the ICLG website.

October 21, 2024

Thai Court Decision Moves Design Assessment Closer to International Standards

Thailand’s Central Intellectual Property and International Trade (IP&IT) Court has delivered a favorable ruling for Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd., a major player in the tire manufacturing industry, regarding the registration of its motorcycle tire design patent. In this case, Tilleke & Gibbins represented Sumitomo in successfully advocating for recognition of the unique design elements in the company’s motorcycle tire products. Case Overview The case revolved around Sumitomo’s two design patent applications for motorcycle tire designs, which were initially rejected by the Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) on the grounds that they were similar to prior art. Based on an examination of the design elements, primarily focusing on the tire tread patterns, the DIP’s Patent Board had concluded that Sumitomo’s designs were not sufficiently unique to warrant patent protection, as the tread patterns of the new designs were deemed too similar to one found in prior art for tire products. In response, Tilleke & Gibbins filed a complaint with the IP&IT Court on behalf of Sumitomo, seeking a revocation of the Patent Board’s decision and requesting that the court compel the DIP, as the defendant, to proceed with the registration of Sumitomo’s design patents. The complaint emphasized that the designs were novel and distinct, warranting patent protection under Thai law. Legal Strategy The firm’s legal argument focused on the interpretation of Thai patent law, particularly regarding the protection of a product’s external appearance, and emphasized that the determination of a design’s novelty must consider the product’s overall appearance rather than isolating individual features. This approach is consistent with international guidelines on design patents, which require the evaluation of novelty and distinctiveness based on how an informed user would perceive the design as a whole. While Sumitomo’s tire tread patterns may share some superficial similarities to existing designs, the overall impression

You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

Industries

Practices

February 23, 2025