You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge
We provide you with all of the latest legal developments in Southeast Asia, ensuring that you have the up-to-date knowledge you need to navigate the ever-changing legal landscape affecting your business. You can browse our entire library of publications below, and email [email protected] to sign up for updates that are relevant to your interests, delivered straight to your mailbox, as they emerge.
This article describes the enforcement campaign being pursued by SKF in an attempt to rid the Thai market of counterfeit bearings, which pose a serious risk to consumer safety.
By examining a major seizure of counterfeit Casio and Citizen products, this article offers insight into a new method being used by infringers to attempt to circumvent customs procedures.
Members of the Tilleke & Gibbins IP enforcement team have recently conducted several training sessions for police and customs officials in different cities, at ports of entry, and at border crossings. The training focused on methods of identifying and differentiating between genuine and counterfeit goods and also reiterated the importance of cooperation between government authorities and brand owners in the suppression of counterfeiting in Thailand. This article describes the training sessions and the benefits they yield for IP rights owners.
The Supreme Court of Thailand recently pronounced its decision to uphold an appeal in a long-running patent battle between two Korean-owned companies in Thailand. The parties to this conflict compete with each other in manufacturing rubber products, such as rubber gloves and boots. The dispute arose because one company attempted to register a famous rubber boot product for use in agriculture to be exclusively owned as a design patent in Thailand. The other company had not filed for protection of the subject product because it had been used in Korea for a long time.
A concurrent use registration is the registration of a mark already registered by another party based on the assertion that the new registration can coexist with the existing one. Although Thai law allows for such registrations in certain circumstances, the Registrar and the Board of Trademarks are generally reluctant to apply this concept. Recently, however, an important decision by the Central Intellectual Property and International Trade Court clearly implemented a concurrent use registration, in what is believed to be the first case of its kind in Thailand.
In 2002, Thailand adopted the Trade Secrets Act, which contains a provision intended to safeguard the confidentiality of marketing approval data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nevertheless, the scope of the protection afforded by the Act would remain uncertain until ministerial regulations were adopted which would enable its implementation. This article analyzes the ministerial regulation and the current view of the FDA.
Ever since the military coup of 2006, Thailand has been subject to many disruptions. The Council for National Security dissolved the constitution and appointed an interim civilian government in which retired civil servants were responsible for the management of each ministry. This government has taken a number of steps—particularly the issuance of compulsory licenses on certain pharmaceutical products—that are jeopardizing Thailand’s investment climate and its trade relations with the United States. This article examines the government’s incoherent and disjointed IP policies.