Myanmar Blacklisted by the FATF

October 31, 2022

Myanmar Blacklisted by the FATF

On October 21, 2022, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) added Myanmar to the list of high-risk jurisdictions having significant deficiencies to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation.

The FATF is an international financial watchdog that aims to impede global money laundering and terrorist financing. It is a policymaking body that monitors implementation of FATF Recommendations and FATF Standards and is not binding as a supervisory authority for financial institutions.

Myanmar will remain on the list of countries subject to a call for action until the country has implemented an action plan that:

demonstrates an improved understanding of money laundering risks in key areas;
demonstrates that onsite and offsite inspections are risk-based, and hundi (a type of informal remittance instrument for transferring money) operators are registered and supervised;
demonstrates enhanced use of financial intelligence in law enforcement authorities’ investigations, and increasing operational analysis and dissemination by Myanmar’s Financial Intelligence Unit;
ensures that money laundering is investigated and prosecuted in line with risks;
demonstrates investigation of transnational money laundering cases with international cooperation;
demonstrates an increase in the freezing, seizure, and confiscation of criminal proceeds, instrumentalities, and property of equivalent value;
manages seized assets to preserve the value of seized goods until confiscation; and
demonstrates implementation of targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation financing.

Enhanced Customer Due Diligence

Unlike other blacklisted countries, Myanmar is not applicable to countermeasures. Instead, the financial institutions of members and nonmember states of the FATF are urged to conduct “enhanced customer due diligence (CDD) measures” to mitigate the risk of money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing from Myanmar.

Examples of these enhanced CDD measures to be applied to certain higher-risk activities include:

Obtaining additional identifying information about the customer (available through public databases or internet sources) and regularly updating the identifying information or data of the customer and beneficial owner;
Verifying the customer’s source of funds or source of wealth and reasons for the intended transaction;
Seeking additional information on the nature of the business relationship between the parties and the approval of senior management to carry out the business relationship;
Carrying out enhanced monitoring of the business relationship by adding the number and times of controls applied and applying further examination if necessary; and
Processing the customer’s initial payment through an account in the customer’s name with a bank subject to similar CDD standards.

Myanmar’s Response

One day after the blacklisting was announced, the Central Bank of Myanmar (CBM) responded by emphasizing that although Myanmar was placed on the list of high-risk jurisdictions subject to a call for action, the country is not in the same position as blacklisted countries such as North Korea and Iran, which are on the list of jurisdictions subject to an FATF call on members and nonmembers to apply countermeasures.

The CBM noted that all countries in the world—including Myanmar—have to carry out 40 recommendations issued by FATF. These 40 recommendations include anti-money laundering, countering the financing of terrorism, and targeted financial sanction of proliferation. Myanmar has implemented about half of the 40 recommendations so far.

In addition, Myanmar already has prior experience carrying out an action plan to get removed from FATF lists. Myanmar was on the blacklist (High-Risk Jurisdictions Subject to a Call for Action) from June 2001 until October 2006 and from October 2011 to February 2016, and the country was on the grey list (Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring) from February to October 2016 and from February 2020 to October 2022.

Myanmar will draw up a new action plan for the upcoming year to be free from the blacklist as soon as possible.

The CBM also announced that this blacklist announcement is not a big concern for Myanmar and asked the public not to be anxious or carry out any financial activities against the regulations of CBM, as action will be taken against any illegal transactions. In the meantime, those who conduct financial transactions with parties in foreign countries can expect foreign banks to perform enhanced CDD, request evidence of financial transactions, and ask questions as has happened in the past.

Impact

The FATF’s blacklisting of Myanmar at this time is not expected to impact the country’s business environment as much as it has in the past. Nevertheless, businesses and institutions from other jurisdictions should consult with their respective bankers for potential enhanced CDD relating to bank transactions with Myanmar.

For more details on these global sanctions updates, or on any aspect of financial regulations in Myanmar, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].

Related Professionals

Nwe Oo

Myanmar

+95 9 772 440 001

Email

Yuwadee Thean-ngarm

Partner and Director, Myanmar

Thailand, Myanmar,

+95 9 772 440 002

Email

RELATED INSIGHTS

August 20, 2024

State Bank of Vietnam Updates Conditions for Foreign Loans

On June 28, 2024, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 19/2024/TT-NHNN to amend certain regulations of Circular No. 08/2023/TT-NHNN dated June 30, 2023 (‘Circular 08”), on conditions for foreign loans not guaranteed by the government (“Circular 19”). Circular 19 took effect on July 1, 2024, and provides changes in relation to, among other things, foreign loans to pay for goods import contracts and letters of credit. Foreign Loans to Pay for Goods Import Contracts Circular 08 exempts foreign loans in the form of deferred payment for imported goods (a buyer-seller relationship) from applicable foreign loan conditions. Circular 19 adds provisions regarding foreign loans taken out by non-bank borrowers (a buyer-seller-lender relationship) to make the deferred payments for goods import contracts for the implementation of an investment project, production or business plan, or other project. In this case, the foreign loan’s purpose is determined to be for implementing an investment project, production or business plan, or other project; and the borrower can exclude medium- and long-term foreign loan balances arising from the deferred payment in the import contracts when calculating the foreign loan limit. In addition, the borrower is allowed to borrow from foreign lenders to pay for the goods import contract via letters of credit. However, it is worth noting that other requirements relating to the loans are still applied to the borrower, such as foreign loan agreement, currency, and records/reporting obligations Letters of Credit Following the reclassification of letter of credit (L/C) activities from a “payment service” to “extension of credit” under the Law on Credit Institutions 2024, Circular 19 supplements L/C activities into the current foreign loan regulatory framework, including adding foreign loans between credit institutions and branches of foreign banks (as issuing banks) and non-resident banks (as reimbursing banks) where issuing banks are

August 12, 2024

ESG in Vietnam: Legal Framework and Path to Compliance

With the growing prominence of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors, businesses in Vietnam are increasingly recognizing their importance in driving global demand, societal impact, and economic value. A comprehensive acknowledgment of ESG-related legal requirements is critical for investors and companies operating in Vietnam to meet stakeholder expectations and ensure compliance. Our guide provides a basic overview of the rapidly evolving ESG landscape in Vietnam, covering a range of key issues for companies doing business in the country: What is ESG, and what does the ESG legal framework look like in Vietnam? Who needs to follow ESG regulations in Vietnam? What are the benefits of ESG compliance? How can enterprises enhance ESG best practices in Vietnam? Please click on the link below to view the full article.

August 7, 2024

Landmark Myanmar Competition Commission Decision Targets Deceptive Branding

A recent case at the Myanmar Competition Commission has set a significant precedent in the country’s approach to unfair competition practices. The case, involving a Thai manufacturer of cement grout and tile adhesive products and a local Myanmar producer, highlighted the Commission’s willingness to address issues of deceptive marketing and unfair competition. Background The case centered around a Thai manufacturer who has been distributing their cement grout and tile adhesive products in Myanmar for many years through local distribution agents. The company had established a well-known brand and a strong reputation for quality in the Myanmar market. In recent years, the Thai company discovered that a local individual in Myanmar was manufacturing and selling similar products with packaging nearly identical to their own. The local producer was using the same mark device, color, and packaging design themes, and the products contained deceptive information. Legal Proceedings After an initial cease-and-desist letter failed to resolve the issue, a complaint was submitted to the Myanmar Competition Commission. The case was notable because the Commission typically does not address issues of copying designs, marks, colors, or packaging themes. However, the complaint emphasized that the local individual was misleading customers and competing unfairly by using deceptive information and copying distinctive designs and themes. Lawyers from Tilleke & Gibbins, representing the Thai manufacturer, provided extensive documentation proving their client’s long-standing presence in the Myanmar market and the local individual’s deceptive practices. The Commission’s Investigation Committee conducted a thorough investigation, including market surveys and hearings involving both parties. Commission’s Decision After nearly a year of deliberation, on July 4, 2024, the Decision-Making Committee of the Myanmar Competition Commission ruled in favor of the Thai manufacturer. The decision required the local individual to: Immediately cease the production and distribution of cement grout and tile adhesive products bearing

August 5, 2024

Business Rehabilitation in Thailand: Issues Creditors Need to Consider

Thailand has continued to face economic challenges since the COVID-19 pandemic, and some businesses have struggled to survive. One of most important measures that indebted businesses in Thailand can take is to file a business rehabilitation petition with the Bankruptcy Court. The Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) provides “automatic stay” measures to protect the debtors that have entered the business rehabilitation process, and during this time creditors have duties and rights under the Bankruptcy Act as well. Once Thailand’s Bankruptcy Court accepts a rehabilitation petition and issues an order for rehabilitation, the debtor is under this automatic stay protection against actions from the creditor to seek debt repayments, and the creditors are only allowed to pursue their debt repayments by submitting a debt repayment application to the official receiver within one month of publication of the plan preparer’s appointment in the Government Gazette. These are general conditions specified in the Bankruptcy Act. However, there are several practical precautions that are not specified in the Bankruptcy Act but that creditors should take during rehabilitation. Below are several steps creditors need to consider taking at various stages of the rehabilitation process. 1. Appointing a local Thai representative to act on behalf of the creditor in the rehabilitation The rehabilitation process requires much more than just submitting the debt repayment application within the fixed one-month period and then waiting for the result. It also involves contacting, meeting, and discussing with the official receiver, plan preparer, other creditors, or debtor representative to investigate or settle any arguments on the debt. Moreover, the language used in all the processes and documents is usually Thai. In practice, creditors—especially foreign creditors—should authorize a Thai attorney or representative through a valid power of attorney (POA) to represent them during all the rehabilitation proceedings. This includes the investigative

You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

Industries

Practices

October 31, 2022