On September 30, 2021, Thailand’s Revenue Department released a notification prescribing country-by-country (CBC) transfer pricing reporting requirements for multinational enterprise (MNE) groups that do business in Thailand. The Notification of the Director-General of the Revenue Department Re: Income Tax (No. 408) applies to accounting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2021, with the CBC report submitted at the same time as the annual corporate income tax (P.N.D. 50) filing (i.e., within 150 days of the end of the accounting period). For example, if the accounting period ends on December 31, 2021, the CBC report must be filed by May 30, 2022. Background The CBC report functions as part of a three-tier structure, together with a global master file and a local file, as recommended by the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Sharing (BEPS) Action 13 report (Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting). The CBC reporting requirement targets large MNEs, with the aim of encouraging international tax transparency, improving tax authorities’ access to information on MNEs’ global allocation of income and taxes paid, and helping governments to assess high-level transfer pricing risks and conduct economic and statistical analysis. The CBC reporting requirement will allow Thailand to exchange tax and financial information on an automatic basis with other signatories of the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance on Tax Matters. This goes in tandem with the recently passed Act Amending the Revenue Code (No. 54) B.E. 2564 (2021), which empowers the director-general of the Revenue Department to exchange information with competent authorities in other jurisdictions. Entities Required to Submit CBC Reports The CBC report notification applies to MNE groups that do business in Thailand and at least one other jurisdiction and that have consolidated group revenue of at least THB 28 billion (approx. USD 847.6 million) in a 12-month accounting period (prorated for shorter periods). Generally, ultimate

On November 8, 2021, the Vietnamese government issued Decree No. 98/2021/ND-CP on the Management of Medical Devices (“Decree 98”). The new decree will take effect from January 1, 2022, replacing Decree No. 36/2016/ND-CP and its amendments on the same subject (“Decree 36”). Below are the main highlights of Decree 98: 1. Classification of Medical Devices Under Decree 98, responsibility for the classification of medical devices is given to the organization registering or declaring the medical device. Under Decree 36, this responsibility was reserved for Vietnamese organizations qualified for medical device classification. 2. Clinical Trials of Medical Devices Decree 98 provides stricter and more detailed requirements on clinical trials. Particularly, medical device trials will include three phases, in which phases 1 and 2 need to be finished before the product registration, while phase 3 will be conducted after the medical devices are approved for circulation, following the specific requirement from the authorities. This requirement aims to continue evaluating the safety and efficacy of medical devices after they are widely used in the community in line with their usage conditions. 3. Medical Device Registration Similar to the current regulations, Decree 98 requires that medical devices must be registered with the Vietnamese authority (i.e., must obtain registration numbers) before being imported/manufactured for circulation in the Vietnam market. However, Decree 98 further stipulates new requirements as below. Validity of registration numbers Under Decree 98, the registration numbers for all classes of medical devices, not only Class A medical devices as in the current regulations, are valid indefinitely, except for registration numbers granted under the emergency registration procedure. Registration procedure for Class A/B medical devices Instead of having to register with the central level authority with a complex registration dossier as currently required, Decree 98 allows Class B medical devices to be subject to a simpler registration procedure, namely, “Declaration of applied standard” with

Attorneys from Tilleke & Gibbins have provided the latest update to the Thailand contribution to Doing Business in…, a Q&A-style guide published by Thomson Reuters Practical Law that presents an overview of the legal framework for doing business in 63 jurisdictions worldwide. The Thailand chapter of the guide outlines Thailand’s legal system and key laws applicable to foreign companies doing business in the country. The chapter specifically covers the following main topics: Legal system: Thailand’s court system and codified legal system. Foreign investment: Lists of reserved business activities, restrictions on doing business with certain jurisdictions, exchange controls and currency regulations, and grants and incentives available to investors. Business vehicles: Ordinary partnerships, registered ordinary partnerships, limited partnerships, private limited companies, and public companies. Environment: Main laws and regulations, factory operation. Employment: Laws, employment contract requirements, work permits, and termination and redundancy. Tax: Taxes on employment, tax and nontax resident employees and businesses, corporate income tax, value added tax, special business tax, municipal tax, stamp duty, dividends, interest, intellectual property royalties. Competition: Important aspects of Thailand’s regulatory regime surrounding competition, centered around the updated Trade Competition Act. Antibribery and corruption: Laws, compliance requirements, regulatory authority. Intellectual property: Patents, trademarks, registered and unregistered designs, and copyright. Marketing agreements and advertising: Regulation of marketing agreements, Thailand’s Consumer Protection Act, direct marketing, role of the Consumer Protection Board and Food and Drug Administration. E-commerce: E-commerce laws and regulations, marketing and sales via online platforms. Data protection: An outline of Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act. Product liability: Procedures and regulations for product liability and product safety, including the Unsafe Goods Liability Act and the Consumer Case Procedure Act. Product liability: Key regulatory authorities for trade competition, environmental issues, and financial services. To browse, download, or print the Thailand chapter, please visit the Practical Law website.

Attention-seeking entrepreneurs are often inspired by celebrities and recent events when seeking new brand names and slogans. Others take a different but similarly sensational approach, crafting marks loaded with double entendre with the hope of sneaking past the gatekeepers. While the idea of registering celebrity-driven or sensational marks may be beneficial for business, is it possible under Vietnam’s IP laws?

A frequent problem with first-to-file trademark systems is that bad-faith applicants may be able to file and obtain a registration prior to the legitimate owner seeking to file their own application. In such a case, the existing trademark registration enables the bad-faith trademark owner to use the mark in the country and produce and sell products there without being deemed a counterfeiter. This “legal fakes” situation bars the legitimate brand owner from commercializing their highly desired products in the country. However, a recent court decision in Thailand affirms that there is solution for this problem. The case involves a world-renowned American clothing company that decided to secure their brand in the Thai market, only to find that there were already several registrations of their mark by a single Thai applicant. Not only was the word the same, but the trademarks used identical fonts, colors, and designs. Not surprisingly, additional research revealed that the registrant had filed Thai trademark applications for various other globally recognized brands, indicating an ongoing record of bad-faith intent. The American brand owner was confident of being able to prove its case in court and decided to regain its trademark rights in the country by filing a cancellation petition with Thailand’s Intellectual Property and International Trade Court (IP&IT Court). The country’s Trademark Act allows legitimate owners to sue for cancellation of a trademark registration based on better right grounds, provided that the trademark has been registered for less than five years. The concept of better right grounds is a simple one, referring to the assertion that the genuine brand owner has a more legitimate right to use their own trademark than does the prior registrant. However, it was still challenging for the American clothing brand to prove that it had a more legitimate right in Thailand. While the brand

The new notification allows BOI promoted companies in the TISO and IBC categories to conduct lending activities with affiliated companies in the same group, subject to certain conditions and requirements.

A new royal decree in Thailand (Royal Decree Re: Licensee to Pay the License Renewal Fee in Lieu of a Grace Period When Submitting a License Renewal Application B.E. 2564) does away with the current red tape associated with renewing certain marketing authorization and business licenses. Under the new royal decree, there is no longer any need to submit renewal applications for eligible licenses or to wait for approval from the relevant authority. Instead, the licenses will be automatically renewed upon payment of renewal fees. There are 31 eligible licenses listed in the royal decree, with a focus on licenses for hazardous substances and cosmetics. The royal decree on license renewal was published in the Government Gazette in May 2021 and will come into force on November 22, 2021. Although the new royal decree has not yet come into force, Thailand’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has already begun renewing licenses for hazardous substance licenses and cosmetics notification receipts via the new procedure. These licenses and notification receipts are detailed below: (Note: Hazardous substances for household use and public health are classified into four types according to their risk. Products containing type 2 and 3 substances are a higher risk than type 1 and must be registered with the FDA. Type 4 substances are prohibited.) Procedural Guidance The licenses for hazardous substances in the table above should be renewed in the two months preceding their expiry date, while the notification receipts for cosmetics should be renewed in the six months before their expiry date. Renewed licenses are valid for another six or three years (i.e., matching the original validity period). Under the new royal decree on license renewal, eligible licenses for hazardous substances and cosmetics can be renewed by notifying the FDA via its e-submission system. The license holder will then receive a payment

Parallel imports—branded goods imported into a domestic market and sold there without the consent of the intellectual property (IP) owner—pose a unique challenge for IP owners. In contrast to counterfeit goods, parallel imported goods are manufactured by or under the license of the IP owner and formulated or packaged for a particular jurisdiction and then imported into a different jurisdiction without the authorization of the IP owner. Intellectual property laws and perspectives on parallel import vary throughout Southeast Asia. The distinct legal landscape in each nation should be carefully navigated in consultation with legal experts to ensure brand protection to the fullest degree. This guide provides insight into the legal frameworks relating to parallel imports in Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam. Each section examines the relevant laws and regulations that pertain to parallel imports and explores the remedies available to IP owners in each country. Finally, the guide presents some strategies to combat parallel importation and maximize IP protection in Southeast Asia. The full guide can be downloaded through the button below.   This guide was prepared with the assistance of Tilleke & Gibbins interns Christian Pederson and Keoni Williams.