Laos Issues Credit Policy Guidelines for Debt Management during the COVID-19 Crisis

April 1, 2020

Laos Issues Credit Policy Guidelines for Debt Management during the COVID-19 Crisis

The Bank of Lao PDR (BOL) has issued guidelines to provide relief to debtors affected by the current crisis. The Decision on Policy in respect of Loans to Provide Remedial Measures Due to the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic no.238/BOL, dated March 26, 2020, aims to assist individuals and legal entities that have contracted with Lao commercial banks and financial institutions on loan agreements, and for whom the originally agreed upon repayment terms can no longer be met due to the COVID-19 crisis. It encourages commercial banks and financial institutions to apply a series of measures in order to help affected debtors during the crisis.

Commercial banks and financial institutions are additionally provided with a series of relief measures to limit the impact of granting such measures on themselves (although these are not yet sufficiently defined to be of practical application without further clarification and guidance). Commercial banks and financial institutions are also prohibited from profiting from the current situation or using it to manipulate the quality of certain credit.

The guidelines for assisting debtors include:

Revising the debt structure of affected debtors by agreeing on new installments for the principal and interest, and revising interest rates to be consistent with the actual condition of the debtors. Accordingly, debtors should be granted a grace period of at least one year to pay the principal and the interest.
Providing new loans to debtors and those affected by the virus outbreak in order to help them maintain their business operations.

The BOL also requires commercial banks and financial institutions who implement such measures to devise standardized rules, procedures, and documents for debtors to avail themselves of the remedial measures, and to send a report to the BOL every month detailing any such measures applied for and granted.

Since there are no mandatory provisions for commercial banks and financial institutions to accommodate debtors in the present situation, it is difficult to foresee how effective these voluntary guidelines will be. In addition, many of the measures prescribed in the decision require further clarification, and although further information may come in due course, some may be reluctant to implement until it is available.

However, there will undoubtedly be strong encouragement from the authorities for easing the impact on debtors as much as possible. The Lao government has committed itself to the development of SMEs during recent months, and the present crisis may affect the support that has been provided thus far. The government may therefore move to strengthen these provisions as the situation develops.

Download Full Article

Related Professionals

Dino Santaniello

Laos, Thailand,

+856 21 262 355

Email

RELATED INSIGHTS

October 24, 2024

Thai SEC Clarifies Reporting Requirements for Shares Held by Directors and Executives

On September 27, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand (SEC) issued a circular clarifying reporting obligations in relation to listed company securities held by the company’s directors, executives, auditors, or persons related to them (“Key Persons”). The circular aimed to address growing concerns over transparency in shareholding, particularly when shares are used as loan collateral by company executives without sufficient public disclosure, which can lead to sudden share loss and executive departures, destabilizing the company. This circular is likely a stopgap measure, and a full overhaul of the reporting regulations may be needed. The current reporting obligations came into effect on March 16, 2024, and were designed to simplify reporting procedures while still maintaining transparency in the capital markets. The rules allow the Key Persons to consolidate multiple transactions and report them only when certain thresholds are crossed — such as when the total transaction value reaches THB 3 million or when six months have passed since the last report. The rules were intended to reduce the number of minor reports and limit penalties for missed deadlines. However, recent scandals have raised concerns about the reporting rules, particularly issues related to the enforcement of share collateral on executives’ or directors’ loans where the listed company may face a change of direction and management due to such forced sales. To ease these concerns, the SEC issued the new circular to reiterate the rules and lay out three key situations triggering a reporting duty: Force-Selling Due to Default: If shares are forcibly sold due to a loan default, this must be reported, and the transaction should be recorded with the Thailand Securities Depository (TSD). Transfer of Shares to Custodians: Under current rules, the transfer of shares to/from a custodian holding them on behalf of a beneficial owner does not

October 20, 2024

Thai SEC Primed to Allow Digital Asset Investments by Funds

Following the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is reassessing regulations on the investments of mutual funds and private funds (collectively “Funds”). The SEC has launched a public consultation on new draft notifications introducing the new asset classes that can be held by Funds, and aims to bring these rules into effect on January 1, 2025. The highlights of these changes are set out below. Eligible New Asset Classes The new asset classes that can be held by Funds can be categorized into two types—investment tokens and crypto assets—and the determination will focus on substance over form. Investment tokens: If the substance involves raising funds, regardless of what the assets are called, and they are legally issued and offered or approved by home regulators that are members of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), Funds can invest in these types of assets as transferable securities within the permitted ratio. Crypto assets: The eligible crypto assets which Funds are entitled to hold focus on crypto ETFs or offshore funds investing in crypto assets, and they are subject to investment limits. Funds can hold crypto assets directly, but only temporarily, and only for the purpose of purchasing, selling, or exchanging the crypto assets, not speculative purposes. The notifications state that Funds may hold Bitcoin/Ethereum for no longer than five business days and USDT/USDC for no more than one month. Investment Limits Typically, the rules segregate investment limits into listed and non-listed digital assets, and the limits depend on the sophistication of the investors in the Funds. In general, UI Funds (mutual funds offered to institutional investors or ultra-high net worth investors) can invest in these new asset classes without any limitations, although net exposure to other crypto assets – which

September 24, 2024

Fintech Insights: Alternative Personal Finance in Thailand

In recent years, Thailand has witnessed significant developments in its personal finance sector, particularly in alternative lending options. This article explores two key concepts in the Thai financial landscape: nano finance and personal loans. These alternative lending models, regulated by the Bank of Thailand (BOT), aim to provide more accessible financial services to individuals and small entrepreneurs who might have limited access to traditional funding sources. Nano Finance: Empowering Small Entrepreneurs The nano finance scheme under the BOT’s supervision is designed to provide funding to small entrepreneurs who might have limited access to traditional financial resources. One of the key features of this scheme is the ability of licensed nano finance providers to use alternative data in assessing loan applicants’ ability to repay (information-based lending). To implement this approach, nano finance providers must have an internal policy on credit approval that supports: Identifying scope and processes for utilizing alternative factors or technologies in determining debt repayment capacity, credit line limits for each loan applicant and total credit limits, and acceptable debt repayment targets; Having resources and personnel with sufficient knowledge, capability, experience, and expertise to operate efficiently and effectively, as well as clear checks and balances; Establishing guidelines for selecting and analyzing factors or financial models to evaluate or predict loan applicants’ ability and willingness to repay; Having an internal sandbox to test key success factors of the selected factors or models; and Having a process for monitoring and reviewing the application of the selected factors or models in assessing debt repayment capability. This approach allows nano finance providers to make more informed lending decisions based on a broader range of data, potentially increasing access to finance for small entrepreneurs who may not have traditional credit histories or collateral. Personal Loans The personal loan scheme under BOT supervision aims

September 20, 2024

Thailand Issues Virtual Bank Supervision Regulation

On September 12, 2024, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) Notification Re: Virtual Bank Supervision Criteria took effect. According to this notification, virtual banks must adhere to standards for traditional commercial banks, along with additional requirements tailored to address virtual banks’ digital nature and corporate structure. Specific Requirements The concepts of supervision remain unchanged from the consultation paper titled “Criteria for Supervising Virtual Banks”. Some of the key additional provisions and details on supervision criteria relate to the following: Financial business groups: The notification identifies virtual banks as financial businesses, subject to the BOT’s regulations on financial business group supervision. If a virtual bank is a part of another financial institution’s financial business group, the virtual bank must be under a solo consolidated group. After the “initial phase” (see below), other financial institutions and companies within the financial business group are prohibited from extending credit to or engaging in transactions similar to lending activities with the virtual bank. Capital fund requirements: If other financial institutions’ investment in a virtual bank increases the capital fund in the financial system beyond a safe level and this poses a risk to other financial institutions, the BOT may order the relevant financial institution to maintain capital funds as the BOT deems appropriate. Service channels and outsourcing: Virtual banks must provide services solely through digital channels, except when necessary. For example, with the BOT’s approval, a virtual bank may use other commercial bank electronic branches via an ATM pool system, use a banking agent to serve customer needs for cash, or occasionally provide on-site services. Initial Phase The “initial phase” runs from the date that the virtual bank commences its operations until it receives the BOT’s approval to become fully operational. During this period, certain BOT supervisory requirements are relaxed as follows: Governance: Virtual banks in the initial phase may request

You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

Industries

Practices

April 1, 2020