You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 3, 2016

New Law on Cyber Security in Vietnam

Informed Counsel

Vietnam’s new Law on Cyber-Information Security (LCIS) was passed on November 19, 2015, and it will take effect this year on July 1. This is the first comprehensive law ever issued in Vietnam on the security of “cyber-information,” which is information exchanged in a telecommunications or computer network environment. Previous regulations on the subject had been scattered throughout different pieces of legislation, such as the Law on Information Technology; the Law on Telecommunications; the Law on E-Transactions; Decree 72 on the management, provision, and use of Internet services and online information; the Penal Code; and information security regulations for specific sectors such as banking and finance.

The key aspects of the LCIS include assurances for the safety and security of cyber-information; protection of personal information in the network environment; protection of information systems and infrastructure; production, trading, and use of civil ciphers; standards and technical regulations on information security; provision of information security services; prevention of spam, computer viruses, and harmful software; and emergency responses.

The LCIS retains the main principle of existing data privacy regulations in that the collection, processing, and use of personal information of an individual require the consent of that person. It also reemphasizes the importance of active prevention, detection, stopping, and handling of computer viruses and harmful software as well as the prevention and stopping of sabotage or use of information for the purpose of terrorism.

The new law requires intermediary service providers (e.g., enterprises providing email services or transmitting and storing information) to have malware-filtering systems in the course of sending, receiving, and storing information via their systems and to send reports to competent state agencies in accordance with the law. It also requires organizations and individuals, within their authority and responsibilities, to prevent the sabotage of information originating from their information infrastructure, to collaborate with one another in identifying sources, and to counter and remedy the consequences of cyber-attacks carried out via the information systems of domestic and foreign organizations and individuals.

The new law further aims to enhance capacity-building in cyber-information security and encourage organizations and individuals to invest in and enter into joint ventures and associations with other organizations in building higher-education institutions and vocational-training institutions with a view to training human resources for cyber-information security.

A current problem with the LCIS is that its scope of applicability is rather broadly defined. Accordingly, it seems to pose some new requirements and challenges which could apply to many business operators in Vietnam. On its face, the law includes a number of provisions that might apply to many organizations that own information and information systems, defined as a combination of hardware, software, and databases for creating, transmitting, and storing information, among other matters, in a network environment. Needless to say, many businesses could fall under this broad scope. These provisions include the following:

  • Organizations which own information must classify information based on varying levels of secrecy in order to take appropriate protective measures.
  • Those collecting information are subject to inspections and examinations on an annual basis, and on an extraordinary basis when deemed necessary by the relevant state agencies.
  • Organizations which own information systems must classify their systems according to levels of security from 1 to 5 (with 5 as the highest level). These levels reflect the potential harm that a security breach could cause to other entities, social order, and national security, among other matters. These organizations must also formulate policies and rules to ensure cyber-information security when designing, developing, managing, operating, using, updating, or deactivating information systems.
  • Organizations which own information systems are also responsible for protecting their information systems, and must determine the security level of their information systems; assess and manage security risks to information systems; supervise, monitor, and check the protection of information systems; take measures to protect information systems; comply with the reporting regime; and conduct activities to disseminate information and raise awareness about cyber-information security.

It is not clearly defined in the LCIS as to what suffices as compliance for many of the aspects set out above.

While the LCIS retains the existing requirements that the production, trading, or importation of civil cryptographic products requires a license, it poses a new requirement for the use of civil ciphers (i.e., cryptographic techniques and products used to keep secret or authenticate information that is not classified as state secrets). In particular, organizations and individuals that use civil cryptographic products provided by enterprises which are not licensed to do business in those products must declare such use to the Government Cipher Committee. Certain organizations, such as foreign consular offices, are exempt from making this declaration.

The LCIS sets out regulations for new types of products and services:

  • Cyber-information security products, which include, among others: civil cryptographic products; cyber-information security testing and evaluation products; and products to counter cyber-attacks and hacking.
  • Cyber-information security services, which include, among others: cyber-information security testing and evaluation services; services relating to information confidentiality which do not use civil cryptography; civil cryptographic services; e-signature certification services; data recovery services; and cyber-attack prevention and countering services.

The provision of cyber-information security services and trading in cyber-information security products are subject to licensing. An importer might need to obtain a cyber-information security product import permit depending on its cyber-information security imports.

While the new law is a welcome step in codifying the regulations on the vital issue of cyber-information security, it still needs further detail and guidance in several areas. The expectation is that subordinate legislation will soon be issued to clarify the practical realities of the LCIS, and hopefully including a more narrow scope of applicability.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 30, 2026
On September 15, 2026, Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) released for public consultation a draft circular on reporting and information disclosure in the pilot crypto asset market. The draft implements Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP on the Pilot Implementation of the Crypto Asset Market in Vietnam and provides further detail on how licensed crypto asset service providers (“CASPs”) will be supervised once the market becomes operational. The draft indicates a data-intensive supervisory model, with licensed CASPs serving as the first line of market oversight. Public Disclosure Requirements The draft imposes detailed public disclosure requirements on CASPs, aimed primarily at market transparency. CASPs and crypto asset issuers must make disclosures in both Vietnamese and English, retain reported and disclosed information for at least 10 years, and keep information published on their websites accessible for at least five years. For CASPs, disclosure obligations arise both periodically and when specific events occur. A CASP must announce any crypto asset to be admitted to trading on its website at least seven days before trading begins and publish periodic financial statements. Certain extraordinary events and information requested by the MOF must generally be disclosed within 24 hours. CASPs must also provide ongoing market information. During trading hours, they must publish key trading data, including prices and volumes, daily highs and lows, average prices, the three best bid and offer levels, and transactions by foreign investors. By 9:00 a.m. each trading day, they must publish specified information on the previous day’s trading activity. Regulatory Reporting Requirements Separate from public disclosure, the draft requires CASPs to provide regulators with detailed information enabling ongoing supervision of their operations and the market. For market activity, CASPs must report decisions to admit or remove a crypto asset from trading within 24 hours, submit previous-day trading data to the State Securities Commission
September 24, 2026
Vietnam is implementing and developing a broad package of regulatory reforms that could reshape how IP, data, digital platforms, and product authenticity are regulated and enforced. Several of the key measures have been led by the Ministry of Public Security in its legislative and administrative capacity, as part of a broader government effort. The core reform package consists of four key legal instruments: proposed amendments to the Criminal Code, a proposed new Data Security Law, a draft Decree on Product Identification, Authentication and Traceability, and the newly enacted Decree No. 330/2026/ND-CP. These instruments include rules on criminal enforcement, data security, electronic identification, product identification and traceability, administrative violations, and cybersecurity sanctions. Combined, these measures will affect copyright enforcement, industrial property rights, trade secrets, AI training data, product provenance, online takedowns, valuation of counterfeit goods and electronic evidence. It is worth noting that, in addition to strengthening criminal penalties for IP crimes, Vietnam’s emerging regulatory framework increasingly treats infringement, data misuse, product authentication, and platform-enabled violations as interconnected regulatory and enforcement challenges. For rights holders and foreign investors, this could mean stronger tools against counterfeiting and online infringement, but also more compliance obligations around data, traceability, AI, platform controls and government-facing reporting. Expansion of Criminal IP Enforcement Proposed amendments to Article 225 of the Criminal Code would expand criminal copyright exposure beyond reproduction and distribution to cover large-scale commercial public performance and online communication of works, phonograms and video recordings. This is important because piracy is increasingly about streaming, unauthorized communication, and platform access models rather than physical copying. Aggravated copyright infringement could be subject to up to 10 years in prison for individuals and fines of up to VND 6 billion (about USD 228,300) for commercial legal entities. The amended Article 226 would expand criminal industrial property liability beyond
September 17, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) has released for public comment a draft bill to amend the Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979), the country’s foundational consumer protection legislation. The draft amendment aims to modernize the nearly five-decade-old framework to address the rapid growth of digital commerce, online advertising, influencer marketing, and new business models. The public consultation period is open until October 10, 2026. Expanded Definitions Covering Digital Commerce The draft significantly broadens several core definitions to capture modern commercial activities: “Consumer” is expanded to include natural persons and nonprofit juristic persons who purchase or receive services, including those solicited by businesses and end users who do not directly pay for the goods or services. “Business operator” now explicitly covers advertising business operators and hired advertising persons, such as influencers and content creators. “Advertising media” is expanded to include digital platforms, social media, and social media user accounts. “Label” now encompasses electronic labels—symbols, codes, or other electronic formats displaying product information. Influencer and Advertising Disclosure Requirements In addition to these expanded definitions, “hired advertising person for selling goods or services” is a new definition covering influencers, content creators, live streamers, affiliate marketers, and virtual online media operators who receive monetary compensation or other benefits for advertising goods or services. Hired advertising persons—including influencers and content creators—must disclose to consumers that content is advertising and reveal their relationship with the business owner. Disclosure is required when the business owner employs the advertiser, pays or provides other benefits for the advertisement, or provides free or discounted products or services. These requirements apply where consumers would not otherwise know that the business has a connection to the person presenting the content. Labeling Requirements for Importers The draft introduces a clearer labeling obligation for importers of label-controlled goods, who must
September 11, 2026
Thailand’s National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) has published a new five-year master plan that will bring significant regulatory changes to the broadcasting and digital media sectors, including formal licensing requirements for internet-based audiovisual services. The Master Plan for Broadcasting and Television, 3rd Edition (B.E. 2569–2573/2026–2030) was published in the Government Gazette on September 1, 2026, and will affect OTT platforms, internet-based audiovisual service providers, and traditional broadcasters. Licensing Reform The NBTC will develop new licensing frameworks ahead of existing digital television license expirations, which are slated to occur between 2028 and 2030. This creates both uncertainty and opportunity for incumbents and new market entrants. New licensing criteria will also be developed for audiovisual services delivered over the internet, meaning previously unregulated internet-based providers may face licensing, fee, and content obligations for the first time. The plan also calls for a new law to govern converged communications services. OTT Regulation and Content Oversight The plan explicitly acknowledges and aims to lessen the regulatory asymmetry between traditional broadcasters—which are subject to licensing, fees, and content regulation—and internet-based services that currently face fewer obligations. The NBTC intends to develop regulatory frameworks to bring internet-based audiovisual services, including OTT platforms, streaming services, and user-generated content platforms, under content, consumer protection, and licensing requirements. Consumer Protection and Digital Rights The NBTC will strengthen its oversight of broadcasting, television, and telecommunications operators to ensure compliance with consumer protection and personal data protection requirements. This includes updating relevant notifications and orders and more strictly enforcing rules against practices that unfairly exploit consumers. These measures may layer NBTC-specific requirements on top of Thailand’s existing Personal Data Protection Act obligations. Stricter enforcement against practices that exploit consumers is a priority, with particular scrutiny on advertising practices. The NBTC will modernize complaint resolution processes, meaning service providers should