On October 31, 2024, Myanmar’s Intellectual Property Department (IPD) announced that it would officially start accepting applications for patent and utility model registration under the Patent Law, effective immediately. Contained in IPD Announcement No. 14/2024, this significant development opens new avenues for securing patent and utility model rights in the country. Myanmar’s Patent Law (Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Law No. 7/2019) was enacted on March 11, 2019, providing a framework for the protection of inventions related to products and processes. This is the first legislation specifically addressing the protection of patents in Myanmar’s history. The Patent Law took effect on May 31, 2024, under State Administration Council Notification No. 106/2024. To implement this new framework, the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) promulgated the Patent Rules under Notification No. 43/2024 on June 4, 2024, detailing the requirements and procedures for patent- and utility model-related matters. Subsequently, the MOC specified the official forms to be used for filing of patent- and utility model-related matters under Notification No. 54/2024 on July 19, 2024. On October 22, 2024, the Intellectual Property Agency announced the official fees, including annuity fees, for patents and utility models under Notification No. 2/2024. Applicants (both individuals and legal entities) can now file to register new patents and utility models with the IPD electronically, in person (directly or through a local representative), or by post. To be patented, an invention must: Not have been disclosed to the public anywhere by any means before the filing date or priority date (if claimed); Involve an inventive step; and Be capable of use in any industry. As for utility model registration, the requirements are the same, except an inventive step is not necessary. This milestone marks a pivotal moment for innovators and investors looking to protect their inventions in Myanmar. All stakeholders are encouraged to

On September 30, 2024, Vietnam’s Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) issued Circular No. 06/2024/TT-BKHCN (“Circular 06”), amending and supplementing certain articles of Circular No. 11/2015/TT-BKHCN dated 26 June 2015. These two circulars are the primary guidance on Decree No. 99/2013/ND-CP and Decree No. 46/2024/ND-CP on administrative sanctions in industrial property. Circular 06, which will come into force on November 15, 2024, will improve the alignment between the recently amended IP Law and its subordinate legal instruments. Some of the notable amendments of Circular 06 are set out below. Clarification of Additional Sanctions: Circular 06 clarifies the application of the additional sanction of “full or partial suspension of production, trading, or service activities for 1 to 3 months”, which was recently amended in Decree No. 46/2024/ND-CP. It specifies that only activities directly related to the violating goods or services will be partially suspended. Preventive Measures for Domain Name Disputes: Circular 06 specifies the required documents for brand owners to request the preventive security measure of placing a temporary hold on the registration of domain names during enforcement action against cybersquatters. The introduction of this regime under Circular 06 is expected to enhance cooperation between the Vietnam Internet Network Information Center, domain name registrars, and enforcement authorities to place the temporary hold on infringing domain names. Unfair Competition Relating to Domain Names: Circular 06 outlines specific requirements to prove unfair competition involving the possession and use of Vietnamese domain names that are identical or confusingly similar to another person’s registered trademark, trade name, or geographical indication. However, the regime established by Circular 06 does not fully align with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) mechanism, a standard procedure for the settlement of domain name disputes that Vietnam is obligated to adhere to under the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement

Crowdfunding has emerged as a promising option for raising capital, particularly for startups and small businesses. In Thailand, investment-based crowdfunding falls primarily under the regulatory purview of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC is responsible for licensing and overseeing crowdfunding portals, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements while ensuring investor protection and market integrity. The crowdfunding regulations in Thailand allow non-publicly traded companies to raise funds by offering equity and debentures for sale through SEC-licensed crowdfunding portals. This framework opens new possibilities for businesses seeking alternative funding sources and for investors looking for new opportunities.  Crowdfunding Portals Under Thai regulations, “crowdfunding portals” are defined as websites, mobile phone applications, or other similar electronic media developed for offering securities for sale. To operate a crowdfunding portal in Thailand, applicants must meet several key requirements: Incorporation: The applicant must be incorporated in Thailand. This requirement ensures that the portal operator has a significant local presence and is subject to Thai law. Minimum capital: A minimum paid-up registered capital of THB 5 million is required. This capital requirement helps ensure that portal operators have sufficient financial resources to maintain their operations. Operational readiness: The applicant must have crowdfunding portal systems ready for use upon applying to the SEC for approval to operate. This requirement demonstrates the applicant’s technical capability and readiness to provide crowdfunding services. These requirements are designed to ensure that crowdfunding portal operators are well-capitalized, technologically prepared, and committed to operating within the Thai market. Business and Investment Implications The regulatory framework for crowdfunding in Thailand offers non-publicly traded companies with an additional avenue for raising funds, as licensed crowdfunding portals provide a structured and regulated environment for fundraising. However, companies must ensure compliance with SEC regulations when offering securities through these platforms. For investors, crowdfunding offers new investment

Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Thailand chapter to the Franchise 2025 from the International Comparative Legal Guides (ICLG) series published by Global Legal Group. This comprehensive guide provides detailed analysis of franchise laws and regulations across multiple jurisdictions worldwide. Each chapter of the guide follows a Q&A format, organized into key sections covering critical aspects of franchise law and operations, including: Relevant legislation and rules governing franchise transactions Business organization options for franchised operations Competition law considerations Protection of intellectual property and brands Liability issues and risk mitigation Governing law and dispute resolution Real estate matters Online trading regulations Termination requirements Joint employer risks and vicarious liability Currency controls and taxation Commercial agency considerations Good faith obligations and fair dealing requirements Ongoing relationship management Franchise renewal processes Franchise migration procedures Electronic signatures and document retention The Thailand chapter, authored by Alan Adcock and Kasama Sriwatanakul, examines these topics in detail, with particular attention to recent developments like the Trade Competition Commission’s Franchising Guidelines which introduced new disclosure requirements and protections for franchisees. The complete Thailand chapter is available as a PDF below. The Thailand chapter—and the full Franchise 2025 guide—are also freely available on the ICLG website.

On September 18, 2024, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued comprehensive guidelines to make it easier for foreign business operators to provide investment services in Thailand. These guidelines are designed to support Thailand’s goal of becoming a global financial hub and align with government efforts to enhance the ease of doing business. The guidelines primarily focus on streamlining the process for foreign firms applying for securities and derivatives licenses, and ensuring quicker and more transparent entry into the Thai market for businesses offering securities (such as shares, mutual funds, and collective investment schemes) and derivatives (such as futures and options). Fast-Track Licensing Under the new guidelines, the SEC will provide support to foreign companies wishing to operate securities businesses in Thailand. This support includes a fast-track licensing process for foreign operators that meet certain qualifications, such as having a company incorporated in Thailand, having operated a system of group companies for at least five consecutive years, and being supervised by a regulator under the IOSCO MMoU (International Organization of Securities Commissions Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding). The SEC will also collaborate with the Ministry of Commerce to grant exemptions from the requirement of a foreign business license for companies providing certain services relating to or supporting securities or derivatives businesses, such as net asset value calculation/confirmation for mutual funds, and promotion of capital market products. Applying for foreign business licenses has long been a complicated process for foreign operators, and this exemption can help reduce such complications. Targeted License Exemptions to Reduce Regulatory Burdens Foreign operators providing specific investment services may be exempt from full securities and derivatives licensing requirements, saving time and costs associated with the full licensing process, and allowing them to start their businesses quickly and efficiently. Key exemptions include: Foreign operators providing derivatives services solely

On September 27, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand (SEC) issued a circular clarifying reporting obligations in relation to listed company securities held by the company’s directors, executives, auditors, or persons related to them (“Key Persons”). The circular aimed to address growing concerns over transparency in shareholding, particularly when shares are used as loan collateral by company executives without sufficient public disclosure, which can lead to sudden share loss and executive departures, destabilizing the company. This circular is likely a stopgap measure, and a full overhaul of the reporting regulations may be needed. The current reporting obligations came into effect on March 16, 2024, and were designed to simplify reporting procedures while still maintaining transparency in the capital markets. The rules allow the Key Persons to consolidate multiple transactions and report them only when certain thresholds are crossed — such as when the total transaction value reaches THB 3 million or when six months have passed since the last report. The rules were intended to reduce the number of minor reports and limit penalties for missed deadlines. However, recent scandals have raised concerns about the reporting rules, particularly issues related to the enforcement of share collateral on executives’ or directors’ loans where the listed company may face a change of direction and management due to such forced sales. To ease these concerns, the SEC issued the new circular to reiterate the rules and lay out three key situations triggering a reporting duty: Force-Selling Due to Default: If shares are forcibly sold due to a loan default, this must be reported, and the transaction should be recorded with the Thailand Securities Depository (TSD). Transfer of Shares to Custodians: Under current rules, the transfer of shares to/from a custodian holding them on behalf of a beneficial owner does not

One key component of Thailand’s support for the development of fintech innovations is its sandbox framework, supervised by the Bank of Thailand (BOT). This framework supports business operators in experimenting with new technologies under controlled conditions. This article explores the structure and significance of the BOT’s sandbox program in driving fintech innovation in Thailand. The BOT Sandbox Framework In June 2024, the BOT updated its sandbox framework to provide a more comprehensive and flexible environment for testing fintech innovations. The framework allows participants to experiment with their ideas in a controlled and limited environment, balancing the need for innovation with the imperative of maintaining financial stability and consumer protection. Three Types of Sandboxes The BOT’s framework encompasses three distinct types of sandboxes: the Regulatory Sandbox, the Own Sandbox, and the Enhanced Regulatory Sandbox. Regulatory Sandbox The Regulatory Sandbox is a mandatory testing ground for certain BOT-licensed financial services to ensure that potentially impactful innovations are tested and evaluated before wide-scale implementation. Participation in this sandbox is a prerequisite for: License applications for specific financial services. Implementation of new technologies or innovations in existing licensed services. Financial services that have the potential to become a structural element or standard of the Thai financial sector. A prime example of a service requiring participation in the Regulatory Sandbox is the Thai QR code payment via PromptPay system, which involved various banks several years ago until the Bank of Thailand granted permission for these services to be provided to the general public. Own Sandbox The Own Sandbox is an optional program that the BOT encourages for financial service providers and fintech operators implementing new technologies. This sandbox provides a more flexible environment for testing innovations that may not require the same level of regulatory scrutiny as those in the Regulatory Sandbox. Enhanced Regulatory

Thailand’s Central Intellectual Property and International Trade (IP&IT) Court has delivered a favorable ruling for Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd., a major player in the tire manufacturing industry, regarding the registration of its motorcycle tire design patent. In this case, Tilleke & Gibbins represented Sumitomo in successfully advocating for recognition of the unique design elements in the company’s motorcycle tire products. Case Overview The case revolved around Sumitomo’s two design patent applications for motorcycle tire designs, which were initially rejected by the Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) on the grounds that they were similar to prior art. Based on an examination of the design elements, primarily focusing on the tire tread patterns, the DIP’s Patent Board had concluded that Sumitomo’s designs were not sufficiently unique to warrant patent protection, as the tread patterns of the new designs were deemed too similar to one found in prior art for tire products. In response, Tilleke & Gibbins filed a complaint with the IP&IT Court on behalf of Sumitomo, seeking a revocation of the Patent Board’s decision and requesting that the court compel the DIP, as the defendant, to proceed with the registration of Sumitomo’s design patents. The complaint emphasized that the designs were novel and distinct, warranting patent protection under Thai law. Legal Strategy The firm’s legal argument focused on the interpretation of Thai patent law, particularly regarding the protection of a product’s external appearance, and emphasized that the determination of a design’s novelty must consider the product’s overall appearance rather than isolating individual features. This approach is consistent with international guidelines on design patents, which require the evaluation of novelty and distinctiveness based on how an informed user would perceive the design as a whole. While Sumitomo’s tire tread patterns may share some superficial similarities to existing designs, the overall impression